Heterophenomenology is Daniel C Dennett's third-person approach to the science of consciousness. It's similar to a method that readers of literature use to believe, detail, and interpret the actions, thoughts, and characters of what they read to form their definitive version of the work of art.
Sweet Dreams: Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciousness (2005) is Dennett's later book on heterophenomenology.
An End to Qualia? Dennett's Defense of Heterophenomenology (Spring 2007): A short review: Dennett goes on the offensive against the 'new mysterians', those who argue that the problem of consciousness is fundamentally unsolvable or requires an explanatory framework outside that used by observational science.
Poetics, Perception, Disinterestedness: An Online Notebook
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(56)
-
▼
May
(21)
- Neurology of the Arts
- Pinker in Edinburgh
- The Most Important Six Seconds of 1969
- Bad Rhymes
- Shakespeare and the Second Law of Thermodynamics
- The Neurological Roots of Sexual Pleasure
- The Neurological Roots of Sexual Pleasure
- Edwin Morgan on Iain Crichton Smith
- David Tennant's Hamlet
- Kieslowski on the World
- The Wislawa Szymborska Remix
- Symmetry and Orgasm
- Steven Pinker on Combinatorial Grammar
- Outrageous Fortune
- Stephen Dobyns on Yannis Ritsos
- Nick Joaquin on Filipino Smallness
- Thirty Years of Spam
- Ethnomathematics
- Nice Guys Finish How?
- Foreign Policy's Public Intellectuals
- Heterophenomenology and Qualia
-
▼
May
(21)
No comments:
Post a Comment