Just as the human mind is not a blank slate on which culture would somehow imprint its content, the communication process is not a xerox machine copying contents from one mind to another. This is where I part company not just from your standard semiologists or social scientists who take communication to be a coding-decoding system, a transmission system, biased only by social interests, by power, by intentional or unconscious distortions, but that otherwise could deliver a kind of smooth flow of undistorted information. I also part company from Richard Dawkins who sees cultural transmission as based on a process of replication, and who assume that imitation and communication provide a robust replication system. |
Poetics, Perception, Disinterestedness: An Online Notebook
Showing posts with label dawkins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dawkins. Show all posts
Thursday, June 05, 2008
Dan Sperber on Cultural Transmissions
An Epidemiology of Representations (July 2005): A talk with Dan Sperber.
Thursday, May 01, 2008
Nice Guys Finish How?
Why Nice Guys Finish Last: Manliness 101 suggests dropping the 'nice guy' act and 'getting with the programme'. Finding a woman should not be the sole purpose of your time. Act naturally as a man and don’t perceive women as better than you, and the good relationships will come.
[via infoshop] Nice Guys Finish First (1987): Richard Dawkins discusses selfishness and cooperation.
Parts 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
[via infoshop] Nice Guys Finish First (1987): Richard Dawkins discusses selfishness and cooperation.
Parts 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Foreign Policy's Public Intellectuals
The Top 100 Public Intellectuals: From the list created of a hundred names compiled by Foreign Policy, the public is asked to vote for five intellectuals. They are some of the world's most introspective philosophers and rabble-rousing clerics. A few write searing works of fiction and uncover the mysteries of the human mind. Others are at the forefront of modern finance, politics, and human rights.
Here is a personal shortlist:
Here is a personal shortlist:
- Noam Chomsky: Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology since 1955...a groundbreaking linguist and a prominent critic of US foreign policy.
- Richard Dawkins: Seminal 1976 work, The Selfish Gene, explores the role played by genes in the evolutionary process. He may be better known today for the criticisms of religion and 'intelligent design' theories.
- Daniel C Dennett: Austin B Fletcher professor of philosophy at Tufts University, where his life's work is building a 'philosophy of mind' to explain how human consciousness works.
- Umberto Eco: His dense novels...are a dizzying blend of philosophy, biblical analysis, and arcane literary references. An expert in the burgeoning field of semiotics, he is president of the Advanced School of Humanist Studies at the University of Bologna.
- Douglas Hofstadter [not in list]: College of Arts and Sciences Distinguished Professor of Cognitive Science at Indiana University Bloomington, where he directs the Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition. His rsearch focuses on consciousness, creativity, at the nature of thinking.
- James Lovelock: His great contribution to science is the famous Gaia hypothesis, the idea that Earth can be thought of as a giant organism.
- Steven Pinker: Johnstone family professor at Harvard University and author of seven books. A frequent essayist, he focuses on language and cognition in his research.
- V.S. Ramachandran: Directs the Center for Brain and Cognition and at the University of California, San Diego. Dawkins calls him the 'Marco Polo of neuroscience' for his work on behavioral neurology.
- E.O. Wilson: Two-time Pulitzer Prize-winner and naturalist, [he] argues that human behaviour can largely be explained by biology. He is Pellegrino university professor emeritus of entomology at Harvard University.
Labels:
biology,
books,
campaigns,
chomsky,
cognition,
dawkins,
dennett,
eco,
hofstadter,
pinker,
psychology,
ramachandran,
science,
wilson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)