Just as the human mind is not a blank slate on which culture would somehow imprint its content, the communication process is not a xerox machine copying contents from one mind to another. This is where I part company not just from your standard semiologists or social scientists who take communication to be a coding-decoding system, a transmission system, biased only by social interests, by power, by intentional or unconscious distortions, but that otherwise could deliver a kind of smooth flow of undistorted information. I also part company from Richard Dawkins who sees cultural transmission as based on a process of replication, and who assume that imitation and communication provide a robust replication system. |
Poetics, Perception, Disinterestedness: An Online Notebook
Thursday, June 05, 2008
Dan Sperber on Cultural Transmissions
An Epidemiology of Representations (July 2005): A talk with Dan Sperber.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(56)
-
▼
June
(14)
- Garrison Keillor Reads Anthony Hecht
- Roger Caillois on Schizophrenia
- The Gay Brain
- Retana on Las Poetas Filipinas
- Reviewing Cognitive Enhancers
- Reuven Tsur on the Heart Conceit
- Reuven Tsur Interview
- Mary Gilmore's Little Shoes That Died
- Luce Irigaray on Sharing the World
- The End Doesn't Justify the Memes
- The Study of Memory
- Darwin a Plagiarist?
- Pride and Prejudice...and Autism
- Dan Sperber on Cultural Transmissions
-
▼
June
(14)
No comments:
Post a Comment